Tuesday 1 January 2008

Good Old Hockey Game

Being that I watched the original Heritage Classic outdoor game, it was only fitting that I spent my afternoon in front of the television watching the 2008 NHL Winter Classic. The Pittsburgh Penguins battled the Buffalo Sabres in front of over 71,000 fans, and both teams also battled Mother Nature in a snowy day in Orchard Park, New York. I can honestly say that this game is everything that the NHL could have ever dreamed of, and it had all the elements that make hockey so great. If I'm Gary Bettman, I'm an extremely happy man today, and I believe 71,217 fans would have to agree that the game was a success.

There were goals - Colby Armstrong and Brian Campbell were the scorers. There were hits - Paul Gaustad provided a large number of them. There were saves - Pittsburgh's Ty Conklin made several huge saves. Overtime and a shootout were both needed as the Penguins won the game on a Sidney Crosby shootout goal to give the Penguins a 2-1 victory over Buffalo.

It was apparent that the snow played a large part in the game. The puck was difficult to move, visors and stick blades were coated in snow, and everything was wet. However, all the players kept the smiles beaming on the ice, and their attitudes towards the snow was cheerful. Everyone seemed to enjoy themselves, and there wasn't one complaint from the players.

This is honestly one of the best ideas that the NHL has, and I think it should be incorporated into the season every year. Everyone has enjoyed the two NHL games that took place outdoors, and everyone involved in the game has said nothing but good things about playing outdoors. Personally, this was better than any of the recent NHL All-Star Games, and I'd prefer to see it once a year more than seeing the All-Star Game. But that's just me. Having the players harken back to their earliest hockey-playing days at the grassroots level is something special to them as well.

In watching the game on CBC, they ran an advertisement for a new feature found on their website. It's called the Hockey Night Mashup presented by Rogers. They allow you to create your own 60-second clip of highlights that they've posted on their website, and I've been playing with this new feature for part of the afternoon so far. Honestly, it's pretty cool.

The best part of the Hockey Night Mashup is that if you create one, they may feature it on Hockey Night In Canada. As the website says, "CBC Sports will be choosing a 'MashUp of the Week' and featuring it during Saturday's Hockey Night in Canada broadcast. If you've ever dreamed of being a star on Hockey Night, now's your chance!" If you want to try your hand at video highlight editting, please click here to be taken directly to the Mashup page. This could seriously eat up hours of my day.

In terms of television viewership, the game proved to be huge the first time when Edmonton and Montreal squared off in Edmonton. The Heritage Classic game "drew a Canadian television audience of 2.747 million, which ranks as the second-highest average audience for a regular-season game on Hockey Night in Canada", according to CBC. This game, being covered by CBC, NBC, and RDS (French television), promises to rival that number, and most likely to surpass it. With the way the game was played - up-tempo, lots of scoring chances, few penalties - it had to appeal to the American viewership. If it didn't, there really is nothing that the NHL can do to increase TV revenue in the US.

Overall, I believe that any one of Toronto, Detroit, Montreal, New York City, Minneapolis, Denver, or Chicago would be an excellent place to host the next outdoor game. Personally, my choice would be a Toronto-Montreal game in Montreal to coincide with the 100-year anniversary of the Montreal Canadiens in 2009. The number of fans that would flock to Montreal's Molson Stadium, an outdoor football venue, would be enormous. The only problem is that Molson Stadium only holds 20,202 fans, meaning that the NHL would probably look elsewhere. Of course, the record for biggest crowd for a hockey game remains 74,544 for the "Cold War" U.S. college game between the University of Michigan and Michigan State University at Spartan Stadium in East Lansing, Michigan on Oct. 6, 2001, so a larger stadium would definitely be something the NHL would want.

I'm looking forward to another game like this, and cannot wait for it to happen. Congratulations to the people of western New York, the Pittsburgh Penguins, and the Buffalo Sabres. You did a fantastic job in showcasing the NHL.

Until next time, keep your sticks on the ice!

9 comments:

Sage Confucius said...

I missed the game due to a migraine and having to work last night. I am not happy about that. The pictures I've seen look incredible.

As far as other venues to host an outdoor game...The Big House in Ann Arbor, Michigan would be awesome. The stated capacity is 107,501. It would be interesting to see just how many of those seats they could sell. A Toronto-Detroit/Montreal match up would draw a ton of people.

Anonymous said...

Bettman must have been wetting himself when the game when to a shootout, and even more when his golden boy Sydney Crosby scored the shootout winner... seemed almost set up to me.

http://www.FireBettman.com

Teebz said...

Ok, Mr./Mrs. Anonymous, here's where I draw the line.

1) Sidney Crosby has ONE Y in his first name. The least you could do is have some respect for the kid who is doing a ton to market hockey.

2) If you thought the shootout was set up, you need a kick in the damned head. How many crossbars and posts did the Sabres hit? Yeah, those were totally planned. Jackass.

3) I am tired of you spreading your "FireBettman" BS across the blogosphere. If you want him fired, spend the $150 million on a team and vote him out. He will not be removed by the fans for any reason because the governors appoint him. Start counting your pennies.

4) Posting anonymous crap that tries to further your cause on MY BLOG will only incur the wrath of me. Post your name, or stop posting YOUR BS on MY SITE. Otherwise, I'll spam your site, and we'll really have fun.

You had better not appear on here again with some useless comment and the "FireBettman" address at the end. Or else.

Jibblescribbits said...

Teebz...

Great Recap of the Outdoor classic. What a great game.

I have to disagree with Montreal as a choice, I know I am sounding a bit like a typical American, but the next classic needs to be done in the States again. The game was a major draw in the states, and actually has people talking about the game down South here. If part of the gaol is to showcase hockey in the States (and like it or nit that is part of the goal) then the next one has to be done in the states.

I think a Montreal/Toronto tilt in Montreal would be fantastic, but the reality is that the NHL has decided to try and make the Winter Classic rival College football on New Years Day, to compete they have to have American Teams playing in order to do that.

Teebz said...

Good call, Jibble. The NHL has not confirmed it yet, but apparently Toronto-Detroit, NYR-Montreal, and/or NYR-Philadelphia are the favourites right now for the next game. I only went with Montreal because of their 100-year celebration.

Personally, I could see the NYR-Philly get a huge boost, but Bob Clarke said on TSN last night that he's not a fan of the outdoor games due to the injury possibility. However, he took a step back when they asked him if the money would be nice.

All in all, once per year for these games would be a godsend for the NHL in terms of marketing.

Jibblescribbits said...

Personally... I could see it becoming the NHL's version of the NBA All-star game.. it's an event that celebrates the sport. It really could be something. In a blogpost I gave my own ideas where I think the next game should be played, but I think a once a season Hockey Party is a great idea. The NFL has the super-bowl, Baseball has spring training, the NBA has their all-star game. The NHL really could use this as it's showcase.

I think Lindy Ruff had the best line about the cynics who complained about the quality of the game/ice:

"To hell with the cynics"

Couldn't have said it better

Teebz said...

I have no problem with that view, Jibble. Good call on the showcase event, especially considering that the NHL All-Star Game is really more for corporate fans than families now.

And that quote by Lindy Ruff is classic. I don't think there is anything else that needs to be said. :o)

Tiffany said...

2.4 was the TV share in the US for the Ice Bowl. I THINK that means 2.4% of the viewing public was watching it, not 2.4 million people, but it was said to have drawn more viewers than any other playoff game previously televised in the US which means YAY!

Also thanks for going off on anonymous. The Sid haters can all f*ck off!

Sean Leahy said...

the Fire Bettman campaign is working as well as the continuous suspensions of Chris Simon.

As long as Bettman is making the owner's money..which he is, he's not going anywhere.

About the Winter Classic...I think having it annually on Jan 1 is a good idea (maybe All-Star Game perhaps?). The league needs some type of staple event that it can hype up majorly. Once a year should not cause it to lose it's luster over time. You could have it for the next 20 years and you'll still sell 70+K tickets.